Board Thread:Voting For New Rules/@comment-24808864-20140618161504/@comment-24786053-20140619065045

I would said this in 3 parts.

1) Wikia and wikipedia share many commons, including article should only contain fact at all. All page would be heavliy vandalized.

New avatar page would be like: 'It was named by very extreme incredible great user call (Any name). It is so green/yellow/blue and amazing cute ! In My opinon, it's dinosaur with dog and come with a wings ! A wing !'

Tesla page would be like: 'Tesla is super extreme complex hard badge to achieve, It require 10 MILLION ENERGY POINT !! Dude ! Very hard ! All of you are cheater except 4Dpro !! He just 12.75 and he is genius ! He get one without cheat ! (Addition 20 more line of blessing)

2) Wikia is a site for fact, personally opinon never make wiki progress. Wasn't this is your goal? HMcCoy. Your goal is keep wikia progess. Wasn't it?

If article contain opinons like what I stated above, wikia probably become very popular. Lets you decide about these yourself.

3) If these explaination didn't work. I would just voted disagree here. And up to Community decision.