Board Thread:Contests and Competitions/@comment-29331244-20160410034914/@comment-25659393-20160411044741

1. I don't think it is possible to say there is 1 goldfish since, "Excluding these two pets, the rest are cat" And if you have 1 goldfish that means: cats = 0 and dogs = 0.The dogs are logical since, "Quantity of Dog(s) are less than the half of entire pet" Which would make sense since dogs = 0 and 0 is less than half of the total pets. (which is 1). But if there were no cats, then there is no need to say, "Excluding these two pets, the rest are cat". (That might not be the best logic, but it rules out that the amount of goldfish = 1 for me.)

2. Now 2 goldfish is possible, But I am not sure it fits well with, "There are a significant number of pets"

3. I think the answer 2<∞ Since any number from 2<∞ would work.

Example:

Goldfish = 5,900,000, Cats = (really any number under 5,900,000), Dogs = any number that is half of the total pets.. Plus it would work with the, "significant number of pets"

Goldfish = 100, Cats = (really any number under 100), Dogs = any number that is half of the total pets.. Goldfish = 5, Cats = (really any number under 5), Dogs = any number that is half of the total pets..