Thread:Cdragon13/@comment-24786053-20140507044626/@comment-24808864-20140507065228

Pranav should not be banned or blocked according to the information listed in Alex's post above. Additionally, I do not think anyone should be reported without at least having a chance to defend themselves, which Pranav cannot do as he is on vacation.

The first link in Alex's post (regarding 1-letter edits)

With respect to the first link, there are a sequence of pages on which Pranav edited +1 character to a page. However, I went and looked at several of the pages and they were not 1-letter edits. In fact, in cases where there were no energy points awarded he took the previous entry of "N/A" and replaced it with "None." It is more grammatically appropriate to say that the number of energy points awarded is none rather than to say you were awarded 'not applicable' many points. These appear as +1 because N/A has three characters and None has four. I did not look at all of the +1 edits, but this is the case in more than one instance.

The second link in Alex's post (regarding inappropriate language)

With respect to the second link, Alex's picture says that two intermediate edits were not included. When I searched, it appears the NobleChea made a good edit, then a non-registered "Wikia Contributor" whose name is recorded as 199.96.186.138 inserted the phrase "porn site." This does not appear to have been added by Pranav.

Summary regarding Alex's accusation

The records are difficult to read, but after research it is clear that Pranav has done nothing wrong and therefore should not be banned or blocked.

Justice and the ability to defend one's self

Also, considering that he is on vacation (as mentioned in several posts today) I believe no decisions should be made regarding his status until he has a chance to come back and defend himself. It is unjust to punish someone without giving them a chance to defend themselves.

I encourage the others who have already voted (Alex, HKapur) to go look at the edits and the history of these pages again to see if they may have accidentally misread or misinterpreted some of the posts. I am not perfect, so I might have misread also. If so, I apologize. I still believe, however, that no action should be taken until such a time that Pranav can return from vacation and defend himself. I appreciate his contributions to the wiki and I submit that he is a valuable piece of our team.